21/06/2010
in a world without labels..
By ulla
This entry was posted on Monday, June 21st, 2010 at 19:15 and tagged with dyke, gay, gender, gender ninja, genderqueer, lesbian, pomo, pomophobia, postgender, postmodern, postmodernism, queer, transgender and posted in badly drawn dykes, genderqueer. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
14 responses to “in a world without labels..”
Leave a reply to me Cancel reply
Recent Comments
Hersch on Club Eden – the Only Que… Kevin on Club Eden – the Only Que… Nomxolo on Club Eden – the Only Que… Butch Lab symposium… on Butch Symposium, part the firs… Lennard on Club Eden – the Only Que… Cathy Tenzo on butch, identity & a little… Ethel Contreras on society lesbians Bennie J. Fox on society lesbians Thembi on Club Eden – the Only Que… Masande mteto on Club Eden – the Only Que… - 30 days badly drawn dave badly drawn dykes blue butch butch-femme cartoon charl marais chart chatlog cherry cherrybomber closet coming out depression dyke dyke drama eastern cape east london emo ex ex girlfriend faggot feminism femme gaming gay gay marriage gender gender ninja genderqueer girlfriend happiness hate heart homophobia homosexual hugh manatee humor humour identity intolerance janna kate bornstein labels lesbian lesbian webcomic lgbt lgbtq lgbtqi love meme moffie pandorah photograph postgender ptsd queer quiz robert hamblin romance runescape sir smoking south africa suze orman trans transgender tweet twitter twitterwhore uganda valentine's day webcomic wordbird
Archives
Blog Stats
- 30,683 neurotics since 4/1/2010
Meta
thingies
eepshow
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
June 22nd, 2010 at 01:16
Ahhh, but with so many nuances and interpretations of the labels, how can ever really know what’s in the can? A ‘well done’ steak is subject to a spectrum of interpetation, and a human being (especially a woman!) is infinity more complex than can possibly be indictated by a soup lable can. We each wear many labels every day: mother, daughter, lover, boss, emoloyee… when it comes to something as esoteric and deeply personal as the labels to which you refer, the intrepretation of them is so broad and changeable as to render generalised labels laughable. Many of the young’uns despise the term ‘dyke’ for example, but personally, I love it! When it comes to defining what a term means, it depends entirely on what it means to you.
June 22nd, 2010 at 03:28
LOL! I love it! Fit’s my mood exactly!
June 22nd, 2010 at 10:40
Lyn.. I agree completely with defining our own terms, but but but .. Language is a common consensus, language *is* labels. We need to at least know some basic ingredients … I’m allergic to some of them ;)
June 22nd, 2010 at 11:45
@ Me – Maybe it’s me that’s emotionally stunted! *grin* Perhaps I just haven’t picked one and made it my own yet… *big grin*
June 22nd, 2010 at 14:22
Nooooo – don’t think you’re that @ all – I just can’t find the answer to – if there are no labels, nothing can be identified + then how do I find the right unlabelled person to have sex with? If I ignore sex + gender, I’m not a lesbian..if I rush about saying “want sex plus vagina” well there’s the labels again..or can I say “no labels except when horny”? Ok I’m being flippant, but seriously..I tend to think I’m just never going to be postmodern…
June 22nd, 2010 at 14:24
Ps thanks :) new cartoon inspired..
June 22nd, 2010 at 16:43
Hey, that’s not a prob for me. I’ve had Mystery Soup ™ many times :P
June 22nd, 2010 at 17:33
You’re talking about soup, right? XD
June 25th, 2010 at 15:33
Yes I am! :D
June 29th, 2010 at 20:07
;)
June 24th, 2010 at 20:26
Why are labels so hated anyway? I think it is in our makeup as humans to label – it’s not a bad thing if we also realize that our labels are fluid and subjective…so what – it’s all good.
June 25th, 2010 at 01:20
Some people use labels to victimise other people
June 29th, 2010 at 19:48
granted….it is also a sad fact that its in our makeup as humans to victimize with or without the labels.
June 29th, 2010 at 20:05
someone once told me that using human nature as an explanation’s just a “crude causal connection” – i remain, however, a firm believer in human nature … we’re orrible!